Sensor Data Quality – Better Efficiency in Maintenance

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

The method of how sensors are being monitored is changing within the oil and gas and petrochemical industry. The number of sensors is increasing while the number of subject matter experts (SME) is decreasing. To tackle this phenomenon the industry needs to become more efficient.

The way sensors is being analyzed is moving from sensor data and expert analysis in the field, to historical data and statistical analysis from a database in the office. All aspects of the sensor can be observed when standing near the sensor. At that moment, an operator can determine if the sensor is running properly or not, but the history is unknown. When analyzing historical process data, additional diagnostics and maintenance data are often missing. Without diagnostic and fault alarm data, the quality of the sensor data cannot be confirmed. Without confirmation, this data is not reliable.

Performing maintenance on an sensor using a fixed schedule, may even have a negative effect on the quality and performance of the sensor. Maintenance management activities should rely on actual, accurate and controlled data. What conditions trigger a maintenance task and how can it be predicted when the task needs to be executed based on priorities? What data is needed and how can this data be made available to a (remote) SME? What defines reliable data? How can the current infrastructure and procedures be adjusted to answer the new challenges from a data quality, software and access perspective?

Sensor data quality can be assessed through a set of controls like validation / calibration results, operational state, calibrated ranges and alarms. The result of this assessment needs to be tied to data that is being stored to assure quality data. The accuracy and reliability of data is guaranteed through this Sensor Data Quality label.

Historical data needs to be verified and filtered to manage the ever-increasing dataflow.
The data needs to be judged following certain criteria. When a number between 1 and 100 is expected and the results is 1000, the conclusion would be that the result is incorrect. This is more complex when it comes to data within the oil & gas and petrochemical industries. Industries may also have additional requirements for managing equipment status and meta data. For example:

– The results of statistical process control

– Calibrated ranges

– Measurement uncertainties

– Operational states

– Diagnostic information

Evaluating reliability data can confirm the validity of analytical data. The data which is not reliable can be stored for a shorter period to be analyzed if needed. An example where this data might still be useful is the determination of outliers for statistical process control.

Putting quality stamps on real-time data will provide assurance that it is reliable and accurate resulting in trustworthy data. Combining these data with maintenance management software will proof that the sensors are trustworthy and shows evidence that the sensors are working correctly within the operating envelope and the limits. Learnings can be shared and consequently shorten the time to identify root causes.

Conclusion

The growth of the industry calls for better efficiency in maintenance. The goal is to use quality data to reduce risk and improve cost efficiencies (manpower, cost of maintenance and cost of production). This is achievable through improved data quality, access, and control, leading to more effective scheduling of maintenance. By improving on these points remote SMEs can consult more easily and reliably. All data that is shared will be controlled, transparent and reliable. Condition based and predictive maintenance tasks can be created with the knowledge of the technicians, engineers and SMEs combined with the analysis of accessible data provided in a secure manner.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore